On 7 February 2010 13:27, Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> wrote:
> There's no reason why it couldn't be the other way around: an > intersection feature could be written and deployed *first*, *then* the > category trees on Commons would be gradually migrated to the new > system. Issues like nonsense results for automatic flattening could be > migitated by disabling features or making them less visible. *Precisely*. This is why the new (and it is new) demand to trash the present category tree before *possibly* implementing a category intersection feature is, in practical terms, indistinguishable from sheer contemptuous obstructionism. Daniel may be terribly offended that I dare to be acerbic about his expression of contempt, but I find his expression of contempt rather more offensive. - d. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
