On 7 February 2010 16:31, Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 8:42 AM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:
>> *Precisely*. This is why the new (and it is new) demand to trash the >> present category tree before *possibly* implementing a category >> intersection feature is, in practical terms, indistinguishable from >> sheer contemptuous obstructionism. > Nobody "demanded" this except possibly Daniel Schwen, who has never > even committed anything to SVN outside of WikiMiniAtlas, let alone > representing the opinion of The Developers. Thank you for clarifying that. >If you are incapable of > distinguishing the personal opinion of a random person on this list > from "demands" by "the developers", maybe you should unsubscribe and > save everyone the trouble. That way you'll avoid annoying the > developers by posting uninformed and obnoxious things like this, It would be nice if you'd bothered to make it clear that Daniel's opinion didn't count. Else your tacit acceptance is the only message being sent. Thank you for finally doing s. > and > avoid confusing non-developers by forwarding them irrelevant or > incomprehensible wikitech-l posts out of context (and this is not the > first time you've done that). Of course I'm going to cc the post to the list for the project the matter concerns. It's ridiculous not to when a demand is being made of said project. Since you're speaking with more authority - what are the actual next steps to make this a happener? - d. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
