Skype sounds great! Also, I heard you work with Ariel, which is great because 
that way you have a more local person to contact with MediaWiki questions. 
Perhaps we can get off-list with those interested to schedule an introductory 
meeting? (You, me, Magnus, Ariel, others?) I am located in the Netherlands, so 
our hours will be similar.

Cheers,
Jan Paul

On 19-Jan-2011, at 19:47, Panos Louridas wrote:

> Thanks to both Jean Paul and Magnus for taking up the offer!
> 
> Based on your input I will look into our developer tool for people with 
> expertise in the following:
> 
> * Advanced JS, preferably with experience in optimisation issues etc.
> 
> * UI design, usability testing, etc.
> 
> * Text processing (of sorts) for the needs of SLE
> 
> (if you believe I am missing something, say so)
> 
> I expect to have the people in place in February, I will let you know. I will 
> be following the list. 
> 
> Jean Paul indicated that we might talk in more detail. I do not follow IRC 
> because of my tight schedule; I do use Skype, however (ID: louridas). Please 
> Jean Paul, Magnus, and others, let me know if that suits you. As I am located 
> in Athens, my waking hours are around East European Time.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Panos.
> 
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Jan Paul Posma wrote:
> 
>> A very generous offer indeed!
>> 
>> My own SLE and Magnus' WYSIFTW are indeed the most active projects, so that 
>> would be a good bet. Actually, for me the timing is just right, as I'll be 
>> working on a paper about this editor for a while, so it'd be cool to have 
>> someone(s) continue the project. If one of your researchers has a brilliant 
>> idea on how to do this right, that would obviously be really valuable too.
>> 
>> A lot of things Magnus mentioned apply to my project too:
>> * Improving detection algorithms, i.e. better sentence-level editing 
>> (perhaps using an external language recognition library), better detection 
>> of other elements. Keep in mind that the editor excludes anything it doesn't 
>> 'understand', so this is a nice fallback, you don't have to write a complex 
>> parser that detects a lot of stuff at once.
>> * Cross-browser/platform/device compatibility (think mobile, touchscreens, 
>> etc.)
>> * Usability testing (the more the merrier!)
>> * Verifying detection coverage (Which % of the wikitext is editable) and 
>> quality (Wikitext -> Adding markers -> MediaWiki parser -> Removing markings 
>> -> Wikitext??) Checking this on a large number of pages.
>> * Test suites (again, the more the merrier, but only for parts of the code 
>> and interface that are considered stable!)
>> * Lots of implementation details: embedding the (current) editor toolbar in 
>> the textboxes, making sure (a fair percentage of) gadgets still work with 
>> this, and handling unusual cases like edit conflicts, etc.
>> 
>> Perhaps it'd be good to have a (video or IRC?) conversation with you, your 
>> developers, people from the Foundation, and people from the specific 
>> projects you want to contribute to. Again, really awesome that you guys want 
>> to work on this! :-)
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Jan Paul
>> 
>> On 19-Jan-2011, at 9:55, Magnus Manske wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Panos Louridas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> At the Greek Research and Education Network (GRNET) we look at the 
>>>> possibility of contributing to the development of WYSIWYG editor support 
>>>> in Wikipedia. We understand that considerable work has already taken place 
>>>> in the area, e.g.:
>>>> 
>>>> * http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WYSIFTW
>>>> * https://svn.wikia-code.com/wikia/trunk/extensions/wikia/RTE/
>>>> * http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:JanPaul123/Sentence-level_editing
>>>> 
>>>> We therefore think that it will not be productive to reinvent the wheel 
>>>> over here.
>>>> 
>>>> Our contribution can take the form of providing developers that will 
>>>> devote part (or all) of their time for some months in 2011. We welcome any 
>>>> comments and suggestions on how we could push this forward, and in 
>>>> particular:
>>>> 
>>>> * Specific tasks / components that need to be designed, developed, 
>>>> optimized, etc., and estimates of effort and timeframe.
>>> 
>>> Hi Panos,
>>> 
>>> a very generous offer! One I would like to take you up on, for WYSIFTW
>>> as you no doubt have guessed :-)
>>> 
>>> WYSIFTW is approaching feature completeness, as far as wiki markup
>>> parsing is concerned, and improves on usability as well. (just try the
>>> new "floating context hover boxes", in lack of a better name, that I
>>> added last night, wich come up when you hover over a template or a
>>> references, for show/hide and rendered preview, and the new optional
>>> rendering for templates as a key-value-pair table)
>>> 
>>> For support later this year, tasks would include
>>> * increase parsing performance (mostly post-parsing steps, focusing on
>>> DOM lookup and manipulation)
>>> * improve editing usability (cut/copy/paste, better specialised
>>> dialogs for images, table/row/cell properties etc.)
>>> * usability testing (I'm using up volunteers fast ;-)
>>> * creating a test suite (to make sure that changes don't accidentally
>>> break anything)
>>> * general compatibility testing (find pages that parse/unparse
>>> wrongly, and patch the code accordingly)
>>> 
>>> I like the sentence-level editing function, but once I add
>>> section-level editing to WYSIFTW, these two will start to converge.
>>> I'm curious which of these will be more suited to small fixes and
>>> adding single sentences/references etc.
>>> 
>>> As for RTE, I know little about. Apparently, it is not suitable for
>>> Wikipedia in its current form. From brief looks at CKeditor, it might
>>> be quite some work to make it behave nicely around parsed wikitext, as
>>> used on Wikipedia.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Magnus
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to