On 12/29/2012 01:06 AM, Arthur Richards wrote: > Thanks everyone for helping to clarify. The fact that there is still > confusion, uncertainty, and 'from my understating's though is > disconcerting. Can someone in the know document the actual > implications/guidelines/automated behavior/etc for this? And can someone > take responsibility for updating the documentation as this stuff evolves? > We should be able to refer ourselves and others to a definitive resource > when questions like this arise.
Be bold! The definitive source is https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Workflow#How_we_review_code , but there are some parts there that is obsolete. Don't wait for an expert to come along and document everything. You can help too. Matt Flaschen _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
