On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Erwin Dokter <er...@darcoury.nl> wrote:
> On 08-04-2014 00:45, Steven Walling wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Jon Robson <jdlrob...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I noticed from Kaldari's notes [1] that "Open sans" was rejected based >>> on language support and install base. >>> >> > > >> A similar example is Google's Noto font ( >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noto_fonts). It has basically no default >> install base that I'm aware of, but it's focused on readability in as many >> scripts as possible and is Apache-licensed. >> > > Noto is useless without a suitable localization mechanism. > Erwin, can you help me understand what is a "suitable localization mechanism"? I filed bug 59983 ("Investigate noto font as potential replacement for diverse font families") back in January because I thought it could help with localization, so I'd really like to grok this. https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59983 _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
