Tony Thomas <01tonythomas at gmail.com> wrote: > Scenario: I am new contributor looking at your repository (possibly > would've contributed to couple of repos in the past in Github). As a > maintainer of this repo, how do you want me to know that my interactions > with your product, which might be, but not limited to (1) creating an > improvement with you or the community on your extension (2) asking for > review on an improvement with you or the community on your extension is > secured under the CoC ?
This has already been addressed by me and others on this thread, but it's worth repeating: in this scenario, your improvements to my software are *not necessarily* covered by the Code of Conduct. If they occur on Gerrit, Phabricator, etc. they are; if they occur by private email, over Skype, etc. they're not. That's why I think the file in its current wording is misleading. > probably I think the push back would've been > way lighter if you would've (1) explained your case clearly there in the > commit and (2) probably came up with alternatives so we could push forward > and (3) not merged it yourself. I don't believe there was any "pushback" - the current problems started when a few developers noticed that one of my extensions didn't have that file. -Yaron _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
