Hi, Antoine - thank you; I see now that your statement before to archive my repository was just because you thought it was no longer in use. I feel better now.
Gergo Tisza <gtisza at wikimedia.org> wrote: > * There can be all kinds of reasons why the CoC file is not appropriate for > some repository (which is why it wasn't added to all repositories, just > MediaWiki and its extensions). But if we let people remove it for the sole > reason that they don't like the code of conduct, what does it say about out > commitment to enforce it? Thanks for your thoughtful response. I just want to clarify that I do indeed have pragmatic reasons for not wanting that file, unrelated to my opinion of the CoC. As I wrote briefly before, I just don't think the file is making an accurate statement, given that it implies that *all* development of the extension is governed by the CoC, which is not the case. I suppose that one solution which hasn't been discussed yet is to change the wording of that file so that it says something more defensible, like "This extension is hosted on facilities governed by the Code of Conduct", or that kind of thing - that would at least remove the pragmatic objection that I (and some others in this thread) have raised. It still leaves open the question of whether the file should be made mandatory, and if so, what the mechanism should be to determine that. -Yaron _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
