On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Pete Holsberg wrote:
This stems from a discussion I've been having with the
so-called IT person at my wife's employer, a small
non-profit, who is a buzzword grabber and who has decided
that all of the computers at the soup kitchen should have XP
Pro rather than Home. They have no servers and no Active
Directory thingies and don't even use file- or print-sharing!
And she decided that being able to changes the reserved
bandwidth is a compelling reason for XP Pro.
None of the above have anything to do (directly) with QoS. QoS
has to do with QoS-aware apps/protocols and QoS-aware hardware
working together in QoS-type situations. [Good luck getting
that clarified. :) ]
Besides QoS is generally considered to be a *good* thing !
--
----------------------------------------
The WIN-HOME mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
