Andy Medina wrote:
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Pete Holsberg wrote:
And then I made the apparent mistake of telling you why this
came up in the first place.
It may be a good thing you made the "mistake". The argument
you are (or were?) presenting (no active directory and no
file/printer sharing) probably will not trump the "reclaim the
reserved 20%" argument she is presenting. Who can turn down a
"faster" internet connection, especially if someone makes the
argument that the "reserved" bandwidth is being paid for, but
not used.
If the "reserved bandwidth" argument is bogus, how does it trump
the "no AD" argument???
--
Pete Holsberg
Columbus, NJ
There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government
ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the
public liberty.
--John Adams, Journal, 1772
--
----------------------------------------
WIN-HOME Archives: http://PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM/archives/WIN-HOME.html
Contact the List Owner about anything: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Official Win-Home List Members Profiles Page
http://www.besteffort.com/winhome/Profiles.html
