On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Coronya wrote:
<snip>
> BTW, I am in favor of a patched general kernel source on the CD. It would
> really come in handy.
>
A generic tarball of the kernel source (possibly already patched) should
be included on the CD. That way you can always patch up to the latest
version with a couple of large but smaller-than-the-whole-kernel patchs.
They could stick on, say 2.4.3. Then when 2.4.4 comes out, just download
the patch from kernel.org and you'll have the latest version. the merge
hook patch should also be on the CD in a separate file
Michael
> Coronya
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, yan seiner wrote:
>
> > Michael L Torrie wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, yan seiner wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > What glibc fiasco are you talking about and how does it relate to the
> > > kernel?
> >
> > RH 7 came out with a broken glibc and a non-standard compiler. The
> > glibc was quickly patched (though it still remains broken for some
> > international support) and everyone uses kgcc instead of RH's gcc.
> >
> > The generic kernel won't even compile on a RH system unless you use
> > kgcc.
> >
> > --Yan
> > _______________________________________________
> > Win4Lin-users mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Win4Lin-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
>
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
