Jens Benecke writes:

 > > So my question is: what is the easiest way to get win4lin on a desktop?
 > > and my answer is: dump the distro kernel, use the kernel.org kernel.
 > 
 > No.
 > 
 > Guess what happens when SuSE 7.2 comes out and formats your disk
 > with ReiserFS by default and the kernel.org kernel doesn't include
 > the same versions of the ReiserFS tools. Or if you need a BigMEM
 > patch or whatever and install win4lin.
 > 
 > Providing ready-made kernels for the popular distros is necessary
 > (and I still want a Debian kernel! ;), and whoever uses kernel.org
 > kernels

Building a kernel under debian is pretty easy, using the make-kpkg
appp.  It could be a bit easier, but not much.

 > > Most of the distro kernel mods are for things like file systems (raid and
 > > reiserfs) or multimedia stuff, neither of which I need on a production
 > > workstation.
 > 
 > Well, how do you know what other people need? I for one *NEED* USB
 > and ReiserFS support, which isn't in any 2.2.x kernel by default.

Back to make-kpkg, it will apply the patches that it finds, providing
you put the patches in the right directory and tell it to use them.

from the man page:

       --added_patches foo
              The  argument  should be a comma or space separated
              list of additional patches to the  kernel  sources.
              This  requires  the  patch_the_kernel configuration
              option to be set to YES. Unlike  the  treatment  of
              the  modules, you may only give the patch name (not
              the full path name of the patch file).  It shall be
              applied  during the configure phase (and removed in
              the clean phase) if it can be found in the directo-
              ries ALL_PATCH_DIR/{apply,unpatch}/, which defaults
              to a subdirectory of /usr/src/kernel-patches/.  The
              default   is   that  all  patches  are  applied  if
              requested   (By   setting    the    env    variable
              PATCH_THE_KERNEL to YES).

 > > I still keep all of the RH niceties, without the sometimes funky behavior
 > > of patched kernels.  After RH's glibc fiasco, I'm not sure I'd trust one
 > > of their kernels anyway ;-)
 > 
 > Well, I've been using Debian's standard kernel for over a year
 > (before I needed ReiserFS), and everything worked fine.

and you could still create a kernel using the debian tools, then your
kernel/source/headers/pcmcia/alsa would all be .debs, and you would
also be able to put it on hold so that no new debian packages would
overwrite those packages.

rob
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users

Reply via email to