I also think that Wink is ready for 0.1 Should we start formal voting? On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin < [email protected]> wrote:
> I agree that adoption wise it is *highly* important to release 0.1 as soon > as we can. > > We already got few requests from inside HP to consume Wink. > The first questions was "when you are going to publish first stable > release/build?". > > Does someone have rough estimation on how long it can take to go from > incubator snapshot to 0.1 release? > > --martin > > -----Original Message----- > From: Baram, Eliezer > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 2:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Wink 0.1 release > > Hi > Now, when Wink is JAX-RS compliant, have a build environment and all the > resources are licensed under Apache license, it's time we discuss releasing > Wink 0.1. Having a released version of Wink is an important step of adoption > Wink by users and enlarging the community and I think we should have one as > early as possible. > > What are the things that you think that must be handled before we can > release Wink 0.1? > I have two: > > 1) Removing Symphony references from the entire SDK. > > 2) Validate that the documentation is still accurate after the changes > we enter the SDK in the last period. > > Thoughts? > > --Eli > > >
