I think we should look at the issues in JIRA first and address as many as we can that are related to the server/client/common component (i.e. identify ones that are going to be 0.1 or are going to be later). I hope that we are finished porting the main integration test cases by the end of this week.
In particular: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-34 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-76 In addition, any remaining spec related issues. I think most of these are taken care of but will need to look at the list. I don't know all the rules behind claiming TCK compliance, but I think we should also take another pass at the TCK since there were significant (and IMO correct) changes made. Also, I think Nick had a few issues he wanted to get in. I am also anxious for a release but I think we have to take care of some of these first. On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Michael Elman<[email protected]> wrote: > I also think that Wink is ready for 0.1 > Should we start formal voting? > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree that adoption wise it is *highly* important to release 0.1 as soon >> as we can. >> >> We already got few requests from inside HP to consume Wink. >> The first questions was "when you are going to publish first stable >> release/build?". >> >> Does someone have rough estimation on how long it can take to go from >> incubator snapshot to 0.1 release? >> >> --martin >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Baram, Eliezer >> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 2:22 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Wink 0.1 release >> >> Hi >> Now, when Wink is JAX-RS compliant, have a build environment and all the >> resources are licensed under Apache license, it's time we discuss releasing >> Wink 0.1. Having a released version of Wink is an important step of adoption >> Wink by users and enlarging the community and I think we should have one as >> early as possible. >> >> What are the things that you think that must be handled before we can >> release Wink 0.1? >> I have two: >> >> 1) Removing Symphony references from the entire SDK. >> >> 2) Validate that the documentation is still accurate after the changes >> we enter the SDK in the last period. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> --Eli >> >> >> > -- - Bryant Luk
