The last changes didn't effected TCK compliance. Actually I run TCK each time I think there was a significant change.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Bryant Luk <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we should look at the issues in JIRA first and address as many > as we can that are related to the server/client/common component (i.e. > identify ones that are going to be 0.1 or are going to be later). I > hope that we are finished porting the main integration test cases by > the end of this week. > > In particular: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-34 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-76 > > In addition, any remaining spec related issues. I think most of these > are taken care of but will need to look at the list. I don't know all > the rules behind claiming TCK compliance, but I think we should also > take another pass at the TCK since there were significant (and IMO > correct) changes made. > > Also, I think Nick had a few issues he wanted to get in. > > I am also anxious for a release but I think we have to take care of > some of these first. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Michael Elman<[email protected]> wrote: > > I also think that Wink is ready for 0.1 > > Should we start formal voting? > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I agree that adoption wise it is *highly* important to release 0.1 as > soon > >> as we can. > >> > >> We already got few requests from inside HP to consume Wink. > >> The first questions was "when you are going to publish first stable > >> release/build?". > >> > >> Does someone have rough estimation on how long it can take to go from > >> incubator snapshot to 0.1 release? > >> > >> --martin > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Baram, Eliezer > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 2:22 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Wink 0.1 release > >> > >> Hi > >> Now, when Wink is JAX-RS compliant, have a build environment and all the > >> resources are licensed under Apache license, it's time we discuss > releasing > >> Wink 0.1. Having a released version of Wink is an important step of > adoption > >> Wink by users and enlarging the community and I think we should have one > as > >> early as possible. > >> > >> What are the things that you think that must be handled before we can > >> release Wink 0.1? > >> I have two: > >> > >> 1) Removing Symphony references from the entire SDK. > >> > >> 2) Validate that the documentation is still accurate after the > changes > >> we enter the SDK in the last period. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> --Eli > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > - Bryant Luk >
