Just as a heads up.
We have one of our application using JBoss Rest Easy and I moved the same to 
Wink. It worked quite well.
So we are awaiting release 0.1 anxiously.

Regards
Shashank 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Elman [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 6:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Wink 0.1 release

I also think that Wink is ready for 0.1
Should we start formal voting?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin < [email protected]> 
wrote:

> I agree that adoption wise it is *highly* important to release 0.1 as 
> soon as we c
>
> We already got few requests from inside HP to consume Wink.
> The first questions was "when you are going to publish first stable 
> release/build?".
>
> Does someone have rough estimation on how long it can take to go from 
> incubator snapshot to 0.1 release?
>
> --martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Baram, Eliezer
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 2:22 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Wink 0.1 release
>
> Hi
> Now, when Wink is JAX-RS compliant, have a build environment and all 
> the resources are licensed under Apache license, it's time we discuss 
> releasing Wink 0.1. Having a released version of Wink is an important 
> step of adoption Wink by users and enlarging the community and I think 
> we should have one as early as possible.
>
> What are the things that you think that must be handled before we can 
> release Wink 0.1?
> I have two:
>
> 1)      Removing Symphony references from the entire SDK.
>
> 2)      Validate that the documentation is still accurate after the changes
> we enter the SDK in the last period.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Eli
>
>
>

Reply via email to