[Winona Online Democracy]
Life
cannot be simple, because life simply is not simple. Laws are simply what
we all agree on -- through our legislators. Why not polygamy?
No solid reason, other than most of us don't agree it's a good idea. But
there's no inherent reason it could not be put into law if we wanted to.
As for figuring out more details on insurance, etc. -- we do it all the time
when it comes to inheritance and numerous children or other beneficiaries.
This is not a reason in and of itself to outlaw it. I'm not
advocating polygamy, only pointing out that it is not "written in stone" to
outlaw it.
I do,
however, advocate for gay marriage, or its equivalent, because there are so many
people in strong, long-term relationships who ought to be covered for issues
like inheritance, medical decisions, etc., and it's good public policy to
encourage strong, long-term relationships. And, miraculously, it doesn't
harm us heterosexuals one bit!
- Phil
Carlson, Mpls
|
_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org
