Howdy,

I'm glad someone has a successful large-scale Meru deployment, during our research at Texas A&M we identified similar potential issues with the Meru solution and we opted to go with a multi-channel solution (Cisco/Aruba) instead in favor of flexibility and trust in an intelligent (heh) radio management solution to handle the majority of channel conflicts and interference. A major concern is/was the incompatiblity with legacy multichannel systems, we were moving from an multichannel 802.11b/g environment and it didn't seem like Meru would play nice. James (Illinois) seems to have solved this by evacuating the Meru channel and working with his other groups to ensure they're aware of the conflict.

We were also concerned with what seemed to be Meru playing on the edge of the 802.11 standard, if not breaking it completely by modifying their beacon and other aspects.

I'm not totally against Meru, it has several positives. However, I would just suggest you weigh the benefits and drawbacks and see if your situation allows you to accommodate the needs and compromises of single channel versus multi-channel solutions.

-Justin Hao

James Eyrich wrote:
Joe

At Illinois we don't have 10K APs - we have around 2650 Meru APs installed in over 200 buildings as of today and I find that single channel works well.

I think it does work with multi-channel neighbors - We provide wireless in buildings with University groups or commercial tenants that provide their own wireless, we work with the units to come up with a channel plan in the locations where the two systems overlap, they use 2 channels (usually 6 & 11) and we get 1.

We also have several locations on campus where RF research in the 2.4 and 5GHz space is performed. We have been able to work with the research groups by moving all our APs to a single 2.4 and two 5 GHz channels. Giving them the majority of the spectrum for research.

Besides explicitly working with researchers and departments that run their own wireless we have pro-actively given up using channel 6 in most locations since so many consumer wireless devices use 6 by default.

In general we use a single channel for the majority of a building and channel stack for extra bandwidth in high density locations.

-Jim


--
Justin Hao
Network Engineer
Texas A&M University
Networking and Information Security
[email protected]
(979)862-2162

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to