me thinks some attorney calculated their oversubscription rate on the bandwith into those figures by using a * when they should have used a /
chris On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Gene wrote: > Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:43:57 -0700 > From: Gene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [BAWUG] Time Warner Nasty-gram > > looks more like by the "garden" > > G. > > John Foust wrote: > > > And the "$250,000 worth of bandwidth stolen" part is ridiculous. > > Are they buying by the bale and estimating by the joint? > > > > - John > > > > -- > > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
