> Is there any good reason why the Cisco Aironet bridges cost so much > more than the APs? Looking at something like the D-Link AP900+ which > can operate in AP or bridge mode, and reading some other comments, it > seems like they're just taking advantage of ignorant corporate > customers.
You could say that about all of their other equipment as well, i.e. 'no one ever got fired from recommending Cisco'. After working on Juniper gear, I was enlightened. I think comparing them to D-Link is unfair though. Didn't dlink just add SNMP support last month? Doesn't sound very enterprise class to me.. Cheers, D. -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
