the aironet or ios based firmware for the cisco ap's is vastly superior to 
any other I've ever used.

joelja

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Simon Woodside wrote:

> Is there any good reason why the Cisco Aironet bridges cost so much 
> more than the APs? Looking at something like the D-Link AP900+ which 
> can operate in AP or bridge mode, and reading some other comments, it 
> seems like they're just taking advantage of ignorant corporate 
> customers.
> 
> I need to set up a long-distance link (like 25 km) and I want to put in 
> more reliable radios for that section of the network, but I don't want 
> to pay the cisco "bridge tax".
> 
> simon
> 
> --
> www.simonwoodside.com :: www.openict.net :: www.semacode.org
>                      99% Devil, 1% Angel
> 
> --
> general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Joel Jaeggli           Unix Consulting         [EMAIL PROTECTED]    
GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2


--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to