In practical terms, what does that mean for me? Can you direct me to a link or two that would explain?

simon

On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 09:36 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:

the aironet or ios based firmware for the cisco ap's is vastly superior to
any other I've ever used.


joelja

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Simon Woodside wrote:

Is there any good reason why the Cisco Aironet bridges cost so much
more than the APs? Looking at something like the D-Link AP900+ which
can operate in AP or bridge mode, and reading some other comments, it
seems like they're just taking advantage of ignorant corporate
customers.

I need to set up a long-distance link (like 25 km) and I want to put in
more reliable radios for that section of the network, but I don't want
to pay the cisco "bridge tax".


simon

-- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to