Matt/Paul/Others: Thanks for the flow of info. What hardware is preferred to run the StarOS on? Most interested in the AP, but for CPE as well?
I'm highly interested in bandwidth shaping and routing at the AP, and if routing is available at the sector, then bonus. Does the StarOS at the AP allow for: 1. Public IPs? We use all public IP's (usually kept to 1 per customer). 2. Static IPs? We route /30 subnets out to customers who require static IP addresses. That way they will never change even if the network does. So, a sub-question here is can we route multiple subnets to a single AP sector? 3. DHCP reservations? (We use DHCP reservations...a low-cost low-security solution to tell who's using what IP address without authentication.) Mark Nash Network Engineer UnwiredOnline.Net 325 Holly Street Junction City, OR 97448 http://www.uwol.net 541-998-5555 541-998-5599 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Larsen - Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <email@example.com> Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 6:20 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul? > I would echo Pauls sentiments, exactly. > > StarOS has been great for me, and seems to get the most out of the > hardware that I run it on. I have some WAR boards, but they are not in > production yet - I'm waiting for v3 to be ported over before putting > them up. There are three things that I really like about StarOS: > > 1) Reliability - The code is stable and almost every single failure I > have had with AP or backhaul radios has been something to do with the > hardware it was running on. Sometimes it can be a little sensitive, > but generally it is very good and provides excellent troubleshooting > information for a hardware related failure > > 2) Versatility - You can run it like a regular bridged AP, you can > route individual subnets to each card, you can do bandwidth control at > the AP, you can run DNS/DHCP/OSPF/Squid/Hotspot etc etc right there at > the AP. I believe most of these features are in Mikrotik as well, so > just consider that to be plusses for both of them. > > 3) Ease of Use - The StarOS interface is very straightforward and full > of excellent tools and documentation examples. I have taught several > "green" techs how to run it in a very short period of time. The > Mikrotik interface - not so easy. You can do a lot of basic stuff with > Winbox on the Mikrotik, but the text-based interface harks back to the > days of Cisco IOS for me. I don't really feel a strong need to go back > there. > > One other important reason for preferring StarOS is that it has an > excellent driver for the Orinoco/Lucent chipset cards. I don't believe > Mikrotik has one. Someone recently told me that using the Orinoco > chipset cards was "sooooo 1999", but the combination of a Lucent card > with a YDI amplifier has been extremely stable for me and provides > excellent results especially in long range and high-noise environments. > For my environment, there is simply no better card/amp combination. And > it works best in StarOS. > > I do like Mikrotik a lot - in fact my core router is a Mikrotik. It has > a lot of routing features that StarOS doesn't have, and works great for > that. I know that a lot of people are also using it for AP and CPE as > well, with plenty of success. We are very fortunate to have tools like > these available to us. > > Matt Larsen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Paul Hendry wrote: > > > Hey Ron and happy Crimbo to you all, > > > > > > > > Ah, that old chestnut. I think this question has been asked on every > > forum and list I have ever been on. In general, StarOS has always come > > out on top in any point-to-point and point-to-multipoint tests we have > > done even with Mikrotik running nstreme. Certainly on the WRAP > > platform StarOS is able to pass almost double the traffic than > > Mikrotik before the CPU becomes the issue. I believe Mikrotik have > > significantly improved the wireless driver in the latest test wireless > > package but haven’t had a chance to test it yet. StarVX running on the > > new WAR boards is amazingly fast and we have seen wireless throughput > > tests on the 4 port board that outperforms both Mikrotik and StarOS > > running on P4 systems. However, there are several bugs in StarVX which > > has caused Valemount to give up development of StarVX and port there > > upcoming V3 StarOS to the WAR platform. Unfortunately, there is > > expected to be a bit of a performance hit with this L > > > > RouterOS does have a lot more features than StarOS and features like > > vlan support are much better with Mikrotik. The main gripe with > > Mikrotik is the support and attitude however this seems to be > > improving too. > > > > Because they both have pro’s and con’s we use StarOS/VX for all > > wireless links (inc. CPE’s) and Mikrotik for core routers, traffic > > shapers, etc. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > P. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > *On Behalf Of *Ron Wallace > > *Sent:* 22 December 2005 23:11 > > *To:* WISPA General List > > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul? > > > > > > > > Paul, > > > > Merry Christmas & Happy New Year to you and your family. > > > > How would you compare StraOS/VX to Mikrotik RouterOS? > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Paul Hendry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 03:52 PM > >>To: ''WISPA General List'' > >>Subject: RE: [WISPA] Good Backhaul? > >> > >>I get about 25 meg aggregate through StarOS on WRAP boards and have > > seen at > >>least double this on a 2 port WAR board running StarVX. Testing was done > >>using 2 Mikrotik routers at each end with random UDP traffic. > >> > >>Cheers, > >> > >>P. > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > >>Behalf Of John Scrivner > >>Sent: 22 December 2005 18:14 > >>To: WISPA General List > >>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Good Backhaul? > >> > >>Have you actually seen these speeds? I have never seen a Star OS > >>installation do more than about 17 meg aggregate. If you have seen this > >>then by all means please share the details of the actual hardware used > >>and configuration if you do not mind. > >>Thank you, > >>Scriv > >> > >> > >>noc.kl.terranova.net wrote: > >> > >>> VIA with StarOS on 5.2/5.3 will get 100Mb. WAR board might do same. - cw > >>> > >>>>>>> John Scrivner wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I need some feedback from the collective. I am looking for a > >>>>>>>> backhaul radio link for my main tower. 5.8 Ghz is fully utilized > >>>>>>>> at this location. It is only a 1500 foot shot. I would like at > >>>>>>>> least 50 meg full or 100 meg half duplex. I would like this > >>>>>>>> solution to be under $8K or so. 5.3 Ghz is pretty open here. Does > >>>>>>>> a solution exist? I can lay fiber for about $12K or so. I am > >>>>>>>> considering doing that but I think laying fiber for my main > >>>>>>>> connection when I am a fixed broadband wireless provider sends > >>>>>>>> the wrong message to my potential customers when Charter is going > >>>>>>>> all over town selling fiber connections. I welcome your feedback. > >>>>>>>> Scriv > >>>>>>> > >>-- > >>WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org > >> > >>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > >>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> > >>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > >> > >>-- > >>No virus found in this incoming message. > >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >>Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date: 21/12/2005 > >> > >> > >>-- > >>No virus found in this outgoing message. > >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >>Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date: 21/12/2005 > >> > >> > >>-- > >>WISPA Wireless List: email@example.com > >> > >>Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > >>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >> > >>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > >> > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date: 21/12/2005 > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.5/212 - Release Date: 23/12/2005 > > > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- WISPA Wireless List: email@example.com Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/