Here, read this. it's old, but it's EFF's take on CALEA. http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/CALEA/
If you take the time and read this through (it's HOURS) http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-56A1.pdf You'll notice that the FCC readily admits it cannot resolve the technical conflicts between law written for POTS interception and digital packet network monitoring. It is expecting that precedent and our willingness to just throw up our hands and let them have it will eventually "settle" those conflicts for it, so it will not have to defend the almost incomprehensible dichotomy of POTS telephone taps and internet data interception. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark McElvy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:10 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] LEMMINGS? > I may not agree with everything Mark is saying, but CALEA is more about > Gov't control and convenience than our protection. Running a small > business is hard enough without being regulated into oblivion. > > Mark McElvy -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
