----- Original Message ----- From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <email@example.com> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:25 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] LEMMINGS?
> Mark, > > So this means you thumb your nose at the FCC when they put regulations > into place? No, it means I thumb my nose at them when they come along and tell me I have do something for them...for free. > > The FCC is not in place to make life easy for you it is there to protect > the airwaves from being polluted from every guy that knows something > about wireless and slapping computers together. Wrong. It is there to properly regulate the use of a public commodity (spectrum) for the best service to the public. > Sorry if this sounds a little crude but with all the discussion lately > the attitude seems to be make it easy for me so I can be a player and > handicap the competition. This does not make it an even > playing field in any way shape or form. The Telcos/Cableco's have to be > compliant as does the little guy. They can go whine all the want. I'm sticking up for me. Wrong is wrong is wrong, no matter who else gets wronged. > > Regards, > Dawn DiPietro > > Mark McElvy wrote: > > I may not agree with everything Mark is saying, but CALEA is more about > > Gov't control and convenience than our protection. Running a small > > business is hard enough without being regulated into oblivion. > > > > Mark McElvy > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro > > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:44 PM > > To: WISPA General List > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] LEMMINGS? > > > > Mark, > > > > At this point you are beating a dead horse. We know how you feel about > > the government and following the laws put in place for your protection. > > But to be honest with you this is getting old. > > We need to change the focus of this conversation on how to comply with > > these rules not how much we should disregard them. I doubt civil > > disobedience will work in this case not with the small > > number of WISP's we are talking about here. If this type of discussion > > keeps this up the FCC could just regulate the WISP industry out of > > existence. I doubt that is what your end goal is. > > > > Regards, > > Dawn DiPietro > > > > > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: firstname.lastname@example.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: email@example.com Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/