Michael,
OK but please clarify. No need to be vague here.
Who was paranoid and/or what was the "slip"?
jack
Michael Erskine wrote:
Jack Unger wrote:
For the moment anyway, it appears that ISPs will not be required to
block websites based on either "suspicion" or on the orders of
governmental agencies that may or may not have specific political
motivations to deny free speech in the name of protecting public
"security" or "safety".
jack
Then there appears to be nothing to be either overly political in our
comment or excessively paranoid in our thinking? That is good.
Therefore let us try not to do that. Leadership is a tough place to
stand neutral politically and it is understandable that the occasional
slip happens. Never the less, politics ans paranoia are not the
purpose of WISPA.
-m-
--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
FCC License # PG-12-25133
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
True Vendor-Neutral Wireless Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
FCC Part 15 Certification for Manufacturers and Service Providers
Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220 www.ask-wi.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
