I see. We do the same in this case. If only Trango would implement vlan in their multipoint products, life would be easier.
-Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Oh, each customer doesn't have a VLAN, only the special ones, then we > install MikroTik usually. > > Basic Residential/Buisness applications are part of a untagged VLAN with > Static IP addressing. Simple setup, but effective. > > -Cam > > >> Then how do you tag your customers after the CPE? Do you provide them >> with vlan capable switches? >> >> -Eric >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> I'm not 100% I always use my Procurve switches for the VLAN and leave >>> the >>> Trango as a dummy bridge. >>> >>> Cameron >>> Midcoast Internet >>> >>> >>> >>>> After running the numbers, it does look like I can get some decent >>>> throughput out of this thing in 5.3 using the integrated antennas at >>>> 6.5 >>>> miles. Certainly better than the Canopy BH I'm using now. >>>> >>>> Another question: the sales page for the TrangoLINK-45 says it's VLAN >>>> aware, but there's no mention of VLAN configuration in the user manual. >>>> Is it possible to assign a VLAN to the management interface of these >>>> radios? >>>> >>>> Patrick Shoemaker >>>> President, Vector Data Systems LLC >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> office: (301) 358-1690 x36 >>>> mobile: (410) 991-5791 >>>> http://www.vectordatasystems.com >>>> >>>> >>>> Mike Hammett wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Responding to myself, I think the Orthogon can go to -7 and the >>>>> Redline >>>>> to -20 just for this purpose. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 4:07 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I have no documentation present, but people with Orthogon and Redline >>>>>> have >>>>>> said their products can use large antenna. >>>>>> >>>>>> In a PtMP environment, yes 2 - 3 miles is probably all you can get. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------- >>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:21 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I did not think you could legally run 3 foot parabolics in 5.3./ >>>>>>> 5.4. >>>>>>> Are there 3 foot dishes FCC certified with radios in 5.3 / 5.4? I >>>>>>> would like to see a URL to data on these radio / antenna >>>>>>> combinations. >>>>>>> I had always believed the lower power limits of those bands pretty >>>>>>> much meant they were only worth using in 2 or 3 mile shots. Please >>>>>>> enlighten me. >>>>>>> Scriv >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2008 3:17 PM, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can go 10 - 15 miles within EIRP in 5.3\5.4 in a PtP >>>>>>>> configuration. >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>> believe 10 miles is with a 3' dish. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>>> From: "Patrick Shoemaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:09 PM >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh yeah, one hop is 6.5 miles so 5.3/5.4 is out unfortunately. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The other is 0.5 miles so I will probably run that in 5.3. There >>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>> lot of weather radar towers around here that junk up 5.4. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Patrick Shoemaker >>>>>>>>> President, Vector Data Systems LLC >>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>>> office: (301) 358-1690 x36 >>>>>>>>> mobile: (410) 991-5791 >>>>>>>>> http://www.vectordatasystems.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Randy Cosby wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've had some limited experience with them, and so far all is >>>>>>>>>> good. >>>>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>>> using 5.4 channels, which is an added bonus for dealing with >>>>>>>>>> noisy >>>>>>>>>> canopy stuff. Fairly short hops though. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Patrick Shoemaker wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have two Motorola Canopy 20M backhauls running in 2.4 GHz that >>>>>>>>>>> serve >>>>>>>>>>> as redundant links between POPs. I am located in Maryland just >>>>>>>>>>> outside >>>>>>>>>>> of DC, and the 2.4 noise floor has crept high enough to require >>>>>>>>>>> replacement of these backup links. I am looking at the >>>>>>>>>>> TrangoLINK-45 >>>>>>>>>>> radios to replace these and wanted to get some real-world >>>>>>>>>>> feedback >>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>> anyone who is using this system. Any problems / bugs / known >>>>>>>>>>> issues? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They will be colocated with Orthogon PtP radios as well as some >>>>>>>>>>> Canopy >>>>>>>>>>> APs, which are all running in 5.7. The Canopy APs and Orthogon >>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>> along >>>>>>>>>>> great together running in the same band- am I wrong assuming the >>>>>>>>>>> Trango >>>>>>>>>>> product will have good enough receiver selectivity to get along >>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> other equipment too? It will likely be run H-pol with the other >>>>>>>>>>> stuff >>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>> v-pol (except the Orthogon which uses both polarities via MIMO). >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
