In many ways this is certainly true.  Look at the Roman water systems and 
roads.

Where are the Romans now?

Oh, never mind.

lol
marlon

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Clint Ricker" <[email protected]>
To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ARTICLE - What's the U.S. Doing Wrong with Broadband ?


> Want to truly take nothing?  Seriously?
>
> The mere existence of the Internet is due to government funding.  The 
> wires
> that connect your little corner of Oregon to the great wide world? 
> Probably
> wouldn't have happened without government subsidies.  The same is true
> around the world.  A lot of the research that drives the technology 
> getting
> your bits across the wire...hmmm...government funding, as well.
>
> You're in the wrong industry to invent a moral highroad about government
> subsidisations.  Telecomm is considered a utility, and utilities will 
> always
> be subsidised by governments.  Always have been, and always will be.
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:29 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The fact is, the only things we're doing wrong, is allowing too much
>> subsidy, too many barriers to entry into the business, and too much tax
>> money to be gobbled up.
>>
>> In all of these countries with so-called "great" broadband, how much is
>> ACTUALLY spent by the consumers and taxpayers?   Nobody knows.   I will
>> guarantee you it is WELL MORE than anyone pays here.    No, not the price
>> of
>> subsidized services, the total spending divided by users and taxpayers.
>>
>
>> What is the actual "return" on broadband?    I can tell you honestly, 
>> that
>> with the exception of a small handful of my customers, the only "return" 
>> is
>> time saved, with no monetary returns.    For a few, it does have 
>> financial
>> implications, and they do earn or save money.    I'd say it was under 
>> 10%.
>> Now, that's RESIDENTIAL customers.    Business customers have a far
>> different viewpoint... And they often pay well more than residential
>> service
>> prices to get SLA's, etc.
>>
>> Subsidizing the residential users with taxpayers is both economically
>> wrong,
>> and just plain common sense wrong.
>>
>> But as far as the article goes..  We need MORE "free market" and less
>> interference.   Broadband would spread faster, not slower.   And be more,
>> not less, competitive.
>>
>> But we have to recognize some things...  There are historically created
>> monopolies, and there are current monopolies, and these monopolies exist
>> due
>> to force of law.   If there's anything that's held up broadband, it's 
>> these
>> monopolies.
>>
>> Local and state laws often create monopolies by placing huge impediments 
>> to
>> new startups, or wireless deployments, and often absolutely and totally
>> forbid WIRED competition for phone and cable operators by offering
>> exclusive
>> franchises.   The number of competitive wired phone operators is nil, for
>> all practical purposes, for a lot of reasons.   Yet, we have no end in
>> sight
>> of the wireless phone guys competing for your dollar.
>>
>> In rural America, far too much land is governmentally owned, and is the
>> single largest obstacle to wireless deployments.   Eastern Oregon, for
>> instance is hugely Federal, some state, and tiny spots of private land.
>> Trying to use federal or state land is just simply not feasible, 
>> especially
>> if you're provider #2 for a town of 2000 people and you're trying to be
>> cost
>> competitive.   And Congress can't seem to figure out that handing out
>> grants
>> to people who are experts at milking the sow in DC isn't cost effective 
>> or
>> in any other way effective.   Those who can, do, those who can't, get
>> grants
>> or loans.   Not universally, but at least around here, that's the case.
>>
>> Here is Eastern Oregon, we have one company that invested minimal money 
>> of
>> their own, but bilked the state for millions, and uses state money (mine,
>> no
>> less) to deploy fiber to compete with non subsidized WISP's and other
>> ISP's.
>> And, since their contract is written in a certain way, they use the LEAST
>> cost effective means of reaching people.   They get paid by the state to
>> waste money, IMO.   And are they friendly to being cooperative iwth other
>> ISP's?   Hell no.
>>
>> Every time you offer public subsidy, you simply invite the taxpayers to 
>> get
>> screwed endlessly.
>>
>> And we're ALL taxpayers.
>>
>> If you want to lobby DC and get my support, then the following words and
>> this idea will NEVER surface in what you say... "Give us money from the
>> taxpayers".    If you want to talk tax breaks,  if you want to talk legal
>> classifications, if you want to talk about barriers to services, etc,
>> etc...
>> by all means, do so... but you lose me everytime you say "we need money".
>> If you can't make the business case for it without subsidy or grants, IT
>> SHOULD NOT BE DONE.   Period.
>>
>> And those poor whiny souls who bellyache about "the position we hold in
>> broadband penetration" can have endless bleeding ulcers over it,  they 
>> have
>> no point worth considering.
>>
>> As I've said before... lots of people here are arguing that "since it's
>> going to be spent, get your share".   NO!
>>
>> If it has to start somewhere, it starts with me.  I take nothing.  Zilch.
>> Never.  Ever.   Just do the right thing.  Eventually, doing the right 
>> thing
>> will be popular and can be sold to the saps in DC.   But it has to start
>> somewhere.   Even if it starts AND ENDS with me...  I'm doing the right
>> thing, period.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> <insert witty tagline here>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jack Unger" <[email protected]>
>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:19 PM
>> Subject: [WISPA] ARTICLE - What's the U.S. Doing Wrong with Broadband ?
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Whats-The-US-Doing-Wrong-With-Broadband-101328
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> > http://signup.wispa.org/
>> >
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>> >
>> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> >
>> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to