Plus the cost of the 2.5ghz license in our area... which I heard they 
paid like $7,000,000 for (in an area with 50,000 population)... plus the 
licensed backhauls (Ceragon 18ghz in a ring), plus tower rent (they are 
on the most expensive towers in town).

No wonder they are blowing through investor money faster than they can 
get it... LOL

Travis


John Rock wrote:
> Hmmm
>
> 4 sector 2.5 Ghz system
>
> 1,000,000 deployment
>
> 4000 users paying you $74.99 for Voip and Data from your deployment
>
> It all works
>
> Priceless
>
> Do the math
>
>  
>
>  
>
> John Rock
> Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
>
> Wireless Connections
> 166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857 
> ACCessing the Future Today!!
> ofc. 419.660.6100
>
> cell 419-706-7356
> fax  419-668-4077
>  <http://www.wirelessconnections.net/> http://www.wirelessconnections.net
>
> This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
> and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying
> or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
> reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
>
>  
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Travis Johnson
> Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 7:44 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>
>  
>
> Hi,
>
> We have BridgeMaxx in our area. They are using 2.5ghz licensed with Alvarion
> WiMax equipment. This is the "top of the line", $50k per sector type stuff.
> Then I can also tell you that we are seeing a LOT of antennas that have to
> be mounted outdoors, on a tripod with a 10ft pole to get over the trees. The
> NLOS doesn't seem to be working very well, especially on several of these
> the tower is less than a mile away.
>
> So they spent $250k per tower x 4 towers in our area and they are still
> having to roll a truck and do an outdoor install. And this is even with
> 2.5ghz licensed. It makes me happy to see one of their antennas mounted
> outdoors... that's means they lost even more money for that install... :)
>
> Travis
> Microserv
>
> John Rock wrote: 
>
> Matt,
> I have pictures to show you...
> Believe it or not?
>  
> John Rock
> Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
> Wireless Connections
> 166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857 
> ACCessing the Future Today!!
> ofc. 419.660.6100
> cell 419-706-7356
> fax  419-668-4077
> http://www.wirelessconnections.net
> This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
> and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying
> or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
> reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Matt Liotta
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:29 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>  
>  
> On Mar 19, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Chuck Bartosch wrote:
>  
>   
>
> However, that (obviously) means it's not particularly viable in many
> situations where you don't see enough customers to support a wimax
> base station. But because 3.65 with diversity is supposed to deliver
> NLOS performance similar to or better than 900 MHz, you can see
> customers you wouldn't otherwise see.
>  
>     
>
> I can tell you for a fact that even with uplink subchannelization,  
> diversity, and all of WiMAX's OFDM subcarriers, 3.65 does not deliver  
> NLOS performance similar to or better than 900Mhz. Throw all the  
> technology you want at it and 3.65 is still not going to get through  
> much foliage. NLOS performance in an urban environment on the other  
> hand is great.
>  
> -Matt
>  
>  
>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>  
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>  
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>  
>  
>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>  
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>  
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>  
>  
>   
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>   


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to