I do not care to see people trashing each other's business models
whether they are cash poor, cash rich or someplace in the middle. I am
actually glad to see some data on this particular model because I
think it actually could work well with $3.6M in yearly revenues. I
think it is impressive. I wish we could all gain access to some of
this spectrum, big cash, licensed WiMax gear and build it out. That
does not mean I think it is the only model nor do I trash the
occasional cash strapped guy building his first Wi-Fi POP with his
VISA card nor the typical WISP operator who took out a second mortgage
or similar "pound of flesh" financing to launch his first few towers
using unlicensed. God bless all of them.  I think we should all try to
respect that each of us have a different approach. I certainly do not
pretend to think I have all the answers and I appreciate those who
share what they do to make their model work. I sense some sour grapes
here due to this network being built in your territory. If you think
it is a poor model then steal all their customers and teach them a
lesson. Tell us how you did please. That would tell a far more
compelling story than just trashing their model on the list.
Scriv


On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Travis Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Plus the cost of the 2.5ghz license in our area... which I heard they
> paid like $7,000,000 for (in an area with 50,000 population)... plus the
> licensed backhauls (Ceragon 18ghz in a ring), plus tower rent (they are
> on the most expensive towers in town).
>
> No wonder they are blowing through investor money faster than they can
> get it... LOL
>
> Travis
>
>
> John Rock wrote:
>> Hmmm
>>
>> 4 sector 2.5 Ghz system
>>
>> 1,000,000 deployment
>>
>> 4000 users paying you $74.99 for Voip and Data from your deployment
>>
>> It all works
>>
>> Priceless
>>
>> Do the math
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> John Rock
>> Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
>>
>> Wireless Connections
>> 166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857
>> ACCessing the Future Today!!
>> ofc. 419.660.6100
>>
>> cell 419-706-7356
>> fax  419-668-4077
>>  <http://www.wirelessconnections.net/> http://www.wirelessconnections.net
>>
>> This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
>> and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
>> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>> disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying
>> or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
>> you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
>> reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of Travis Johnson
>> Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 7:44 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have BridgeMaxx in our area. They are using 2.5ghz licensed with Alvarion
>> WiMax equipment. This is the "top of the line", $50k per sector type stuff.
>> Then I can also tell you that we are seeing a LOT of antennas that have to
>> be mounted outdoors, on a tripod with a 10ft pole to get over the trees. The
>> NLOS doesn't seem to be working very well, especially on several of these
>> the tower is less than a mile away.
>>
>> So they spent $250k per tower x 4 towers in our area and they are still
>> having to roll a truck and do an outdoor install. And this is even with
>> 2.5ghz licensed. It makes me happy to see one of their antennas mounted
>> outdoors... that's means they lost even more money for that install... :)
>>
>> Travis
>> Microserv
>>
>> John Rock wrote:
>>
>> Matt,
>> I have pictures to show you...
>> Believe it or not?
>>
>> John Rock
>> Director of Operations - Senior Engineer
>> Wireless Connections
>> 166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857
>> ACCessing the Future Today!!
>> ofc. 419.660.6100
>> cell 419-706-7356
>> fax  419-668-4077
>> http://www.wirelessconnections.net
>> This transmission and any files attached to it, may contain confidential
>> and/or privileged information and intended only for the named recipient. If
>> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>> disclosure, reproduction, retransmission, dissemination, disclosure, copying
>> or any use of the information or files contained is strictly prohibited. If
>> you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by
>> reply transmission and delete this electronic mail.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of Matt Liotta
>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:29 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2nd Look @ 3.65 ?
>>
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Chuck Bartosch wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> However, that (obviously) means it's not particularly viable in many
>> situations where you don't see enough customers to support a wimax
>> base station. But because 3.65 with diversity is supposed to deliver
>> NLOS performance similar to or better than 900 MHz, you can see
>> customers you wouldn't otherwise see.
>>
>>
>>
>> I can tell you for a fact that even with uplink subchannelization,
>> diversity, and all of WiMAX's OFDM subcarriers, 3.65 does not deliver
>> NLOS performance similar to or better than 900Mhz. Throw all the
>> technology you want at it and 3.65 is still not going to get through
>> much foliage. NLOS performance in an urban environment on the other
>> hand is great.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to