That's Time Warner fiber with 15 public IPs. I totally acknowledge how lucky we are to have such a rate here. We are actually to have some cheaper fiber coming into the area which I'll try to snag as a secondary access or maybe even primary and dump the snail pace DSL. I will not gloat, I feel for anyone with expensive broadband.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 11:20 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality > Yup. We pay almost 800 bucks for 20/20 meg. To not do any shaping we would Thats cheap compared to what we pay! You are paying about $40 a meg. Is that tier1 bandwidth? We are paying about $100 meg for tier1. Matt > have to charge way more than anyone will pay. Take the 800 bucks split by > 20 then add overhead costs and it's too much to bear. Bandwidth that will > handle 500+ customers with shaping would then, if totally net neutral, only > go to 20 customers or less. To be true net neutral is just to pass all the > traffic through with no touching it. Reasonable network management, as Josh > says, is pretty broad in definition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
