Tier 1 is fairly meaningless. In many cases, tier 2 bandwidth is better quality than tier 1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tier_1_network though I'm not sure how current that is. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -------------------------------------------------- From: "Matt" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 10:20 AM To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality >> Yup. We pay almost 800 bucks for 20/20 meg. To not do any shaping we >> would > > Thats cheap compared to what we pay! You are paying about $40 a meg. > Is that tier1 bandwidth? We are paying about $100 meg for tier1. > > Matt > >> have to charge way more than anyone will pay. Take the 800 bucks split by >> 20 then add overhead costs and it's too much to bear. Bandwidth that will >> handle 500+ customers with shaping would then, if totally net neutral, >> only >> go to 20 customers or less. To be true net neutral is just to pass all >> the >> traffic through with no touching it. Reasonable network management, as >> Josh >> says, is pretty broad in definition. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
