Where is everyone getting that you are allowed to prioritize anything?  The
speech details three points along the subject of prioritization.  The Julius
Genachowski's recent speech specifically said "no prioritization"--refer to
section 5.

- "This means they cannot block or degrade lawful traffic over their
networks" (blocking / deprioritizing)
- "or pick winners by favoring some content or applications over others in
the connection to subscribers’ homes" (prioritizing)
- "During periods of network congestion, for example, it may be appropriate
for providers to ensure that very heavy users do not crowd out everyone
else" (block / degrade on a per-user basis, rather than per-application?)
- Doesn't apply to managed services (I believe that he's referring to metro
Ethernet with QOS)
- "open Internet principles apply only to lawful content, services and
applications -- not to activities like unlawful distribution of copyrighted
works, which has serious economic consequences." (As I said in my Senate
confirmation hearing, open Internet principles apply only to lawful content,
services and applications -- not to activities like unlawful distribution of
copyrighted works, which has serious economic consequences.)

Where has any statement been made regarding prioritization being ok?

Thanks,
-Clint Ricker




On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]>wrote:

> Right, which is why I phrased it that way.  You can't deprioritize
> anything,
> but you can prioritize anything (based upon what I've read on this list).
> They accomplish the same thing, but at face value, one is permissible the
> other is not.
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Jeff Broadwick" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 12:53 PM
> To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Net Neutrality speech we've all been waiting for
>
> > You'd have to ask the FCC.  Seems like it's the opposite side of the same
> > coin.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> > Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:51 PM
> > To: WISPA General List
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Net Neutrality speech we've all been waiting for
> >
> > What's the difference between prioritizing all traditional services above
> > other and deprioritizing the "bad" ones below other?
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Mike Hammett
> > Intelligent Computing Solutions
> > http://www.ics-il.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Jeff Broadwick" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 12:07 PM
> > To: "'WISPA General List'" <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Net Neutrality speech we've all been waiting for
> >
> >> The FCC has said that you cannot de-prioritize any type of traffic.  You
> >> have to do it by prioritizing other types of traffic.
> >>
> >> Jeff
> >> ImageStream
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> >> Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
> >> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 12:53 PM
> >> To: WISPA General List
> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Net Neutrality speech we've all been waiting
> for
> >>
> >> I read the Fifth as I cannot discriminate - meaning block this but not
> >> that.
> >> It says nothing about shaping.
> >>
> >> Jerry
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> >> Behalf Of David E. Smith
> >> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:33 AM
> >> To: WISPA General List
> >> Subject: [WISPA] The Net Neutrality speech we've all been waiting for
> >>
> >> http://openinternet.gov/read-speech.html
> >>
> >> In addition to the four classic "Network neutrality" principles, the FCC
> >> plans to pursue two more. Quotes from the speech:
> >>
> >> * "The fifth principle is one of non-discrimination -- stating that
> >> broadband providers cannot discriminate against particular Internet
> >> content
> >> or applications."
> >> * "The sixth principle is a transparency principle -- stating that
> >> providers
> >> of broadband Internet access must be transparent about their network
> >> management practices."
> >>
> >> I love the sixth one, but number five gives me the willies. "Nope,
> >> doesn't
> >> matter that BitTorrent users bring your network to its knees, you're not
> >> allowed to do anything about it." Please tell me I'm missing something.
> >>
> >> David Smith
> >> MVN.net
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----
> >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----
> >>
> >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>
> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----
> >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ----
> >>
> >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>
> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> >>
> >> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>
> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to