Micropos make sense in some cases For example we have a trailer park that we are providing service to. I don't expect to get more than 10-15 users so an NS2 on a decent antenna and LOCOS work fine. We feed it with an SM5700 and no complaints.
We use the QoS in the LOCOS for each customer and everyone is happy. -----Original Message----- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mark McElvy Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:21 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Micropops I suppose that is a good term, I would like to be able to redistribute service to small pockets of houses, 6-12, without putting up a full blown AP/BH setup. Any one else doing this? I normally use 5.8 for BH typically and 2.4 for clients, I was thinking of maybe using a PS2 to receive/BH and connect it to an NS2 with small omni to redistribute. Both would be in a bridge and allow the clients connected to connect to the main AP for PPPoE authentication. Is this a reasonable or ridiculous solution? Any other solutions others are using that might be better? I know I could use MT but that would add complexity to the mix I don't need. Mark -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
