Brad Belton wrote: > While I agree no solution can be considered equal in any given location, > there are trends or a general barometer to help place one carrier over > another. > Such as? > This is exactly my point (being made by Tom, a Cogent customer!) why Cogent > should not be depended on as a sole or primary Internet feed. If Cogent's > all you got then you're SOL! > Baloney, we've used them as one of our primary's for well over a year without hiccup. Our so other "better" providers have given us more frustration. > Bottom line is any carrier can break. If you can only have one then find > one that breaks the least. If you can have more than one, Cogent is a good > low cost second or third to have in a pinch for relatively little cost. > > Where are you getting your data from? Curious as to why you feel they are a second or third alternative?
Bret -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
