On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rubens, > > We've found Quagga to be rock solid with the typical application which is > under a dozen peers. > > We did add a patch to prevent the never-emptying work queue backlog problem > when multiple peers flap at the same time. I'm sure this is the problem the > IXP folks ran into.
The Euro-IX folks developed some patches (or maybe some major code revision), you might want to take a look into that, but I guess you probably knew that already... > Quagga is a very mature, stable RIP/OSPF/BGP platform which, given > multi-threading capabilities, will scale to hundreds of peers. I saw some nasty bugs over the years with Quagga, and noticed the enormous effort required to maintain the old codebase; enough to make me always prefer something else. Every now and then a codebase seems to be more trouble maintaning than scrapping it altogether on the open-source world, and I'm pretty convinced that this time has come to Quagga. If you feel that codebase is worthwhile, I suggest investing a large amount of Imagestream revenues on restructuring it. I'll be glad to have Quagga as an option, again. Rubens -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
