" Future FCCs would not be bound by this FCC’s decisions. " For good and bad.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Broadwick" <jeffl...@att.net> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:55:28 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against? Title ll has a ton of regulations…some which could reasonably apply, but most that have no bearing whatsoever or would be incredibly damaging to our industry. The question…and the problem, is that we don’t know what the FCC would enforce and what they would forebear from enforcing…and for how long. Future FCCs would not be bound by this FCC’s decisions. Regards, Jeff Jeff Broadwick Senior Account Manager, Convergence Technologies, Inc. jbroadw...@converge-tech.com 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quick Question: Title II, for or against? The real problem is that consumers have only the CableCo and TelCo as options for purchasing internet. The government instead of regulating should encourage competition in the free market. WISPs are one such competitor. WISPs are prevented by laws of Electromagnetism and Communications to direct compete with CableCo and TelCo for most customers, so this argument actually justifies Title II treatment since CableCo and TelCo are the only ones most US citizens can choose from. Rubens _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
