> Hey ! I never said said do not spend any money !!!

LOL! Good , because I am not finished with my Christmas shopping! :o)





On Dec 2, 9:16 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sorry, no good news for 2009. Well, the best feasible news would
> be same as in 2008 or so so, but it is totally unrealistic. As soon as
> some people have accurate predictions I will post predictions and
> comments.
>
> Hey ! I never said said do not spend any money !!!
>
> :)
>
> Yes, of course, save money, as much as you can and invest it on
> cutting future expenses such as food production,  energy, isolation of
> houses to save energy, etc. Of course, farmland with good water
> supply. Large or small, all farmland counts.
>
> Within next coming weeks, or maybe after Christmas shopping season, we
> have to pay atention to bubbles. If a bubble appears and is detected
> it is an opportunity as far as you sell before the bubble burts.
>
> Peace and best wishes.
>
> Xi
>
> On Dec 2, 2:23 am, "Mercury.Sailor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > authorities would manipulate most markets to rise price, i.e. stock
> > > markets
>
> > I feel like Americans were hoodwinked last week, when the stock market
> > kept going up everyday. It gave a sense of false security right before
> > the biggest weekend spending spree in America. Than boom, here comes
> > Monday!
>
> > Do you think its possible thats what they did to get people out into
> > the store this weekend?
>
> >  Starvation will grow, unemployment will grow up to 9% (in my
> > opinion),
>
> > > at the end of the year there will be shortage of basic goods such as
> > > food.
>
> > Thanks for the prediction, I was hoping for good news.  Do you have
> > any advice you could share. I know, DONT spend any money. Perhaps I
> > should not buy any more gifts this year.
>
> > Thank you so much for your help, Xi!
>
> > You are the bestest!
>
> > On Dec 1, 10:22 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > It is darker than 2008, of course. But there are two different
> > > scenarios. And I wish that I could see a third one.
>
> > > 1) US authorities create a bubble.
>
> > > It probably would happen next month or so. As many economists say, US
> > > authorities would manipulate most markets to rise price, i.e. stock
> > > markets (US authorities would buy stocks), futures (US authorities
> > > would buy grain and other products), etc.
>
> > > In this case, it could create a bubble that would last as long as
> > > government (taxpayers) can sustain the bubble, even one year. It would
> > > not create real wealth, of course, unemployment would rise, homeless
> > > would rise, etc. but it could look like things are improving.
>
> > > If this manipulated rise of price spreads to other industries, such as
> > > housingas they expect, it would rise the price again.
>
> > > This bubble could last all year 2009.
>
> > > 2) Authorities act according to monetarist-alike principles. They do
> > > not act on the real economy but only on financials.
>
> > > Starvation will grow, unemployment will grow up to 9% (in my opinion),
> > > at the end of the year there will be shortage of basic goods such as
> > > food.
>
> > > But there are some politic decissions that I cannot predict:
>
> > > Will the next administration allow foreign sovereign funds to invest
> > > in USA taking above 50% of equities? If that happens in 2009, step by
> > > step the US economy will stop falling in 2009.
>
> > > Will the next administration balance the Federal budget cutting
> > > military expenses? If this and the previous question is yes, US
> > > economy could enjoy some good years.
>
> > > 3) In my opinion, the best scenario:
> > > Itincludes decissions of the scenario 2. Balanced budget and access to
> > > foreign sovereign funds in particular in banking industry. And:
>
> > > US authorities create a huge development plan to create and improve
> > > public infrestructure (windmills for power supply, railways, roads,
> > > etc.). They promote (directly or through subsidies) cheap houses
> > > across the country. US authorities subsidiase current mortgage loans,
> > > in particular those related to cheaper houses.
>
> > > In this scenario, 2009 would still be as bad as 2008, but not worse,
> > > and 2010 would be better than 2009.
>
> > > But, along next weeks, some economists will make more accurate and
> > > elaborated predictions that I will post here.
>
> > > Peace and best wishes.
>
> > > Xi
>
> > > On Nov 30, 11:55 pm, "Mercury.Sailor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > What is your prediction for 2009?
>
> > > > On Nov 30, 5:41 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > My comment:
>
> > > > > I quote from the article "ShopperTrak has estimated that 9.9 percent
> > > > > fewer shoppers will descend on stores this holiday season". This is
> > > > > just a prediction, not a fact yet. If finally it happens, that would
> > > > > be a serious problem. From an economic perspective it would mean that
> > > > > the US economy lost 9.9% of people aprox. From a human perspective, it
> > > > > would mean that the amount of people that cannot buy absolutely
> > > > > nothing grew such amount, I know what Christmas means in the West, if
> > > > > someone cannot buy for Christmas it means he/she cannot buy absolutely
> > > > > nothing but for survival (some of them).
>
> > > > > At the same time, to rise 3% on sales, probably matches inflation rate
> > > > > (I have not such information yet). If less people buys the same (or
> > > > > more), it means that the people who buy, buy more. Therefore, what we
> > > > > see is that people is falling into poverty, and the gap between
> > > > > poverty and middle classes is wider. As we were realizing in the first
> > > > > half of this year, before I left the department where I was until
> > > > > July.
>
> > > > > We could expect that, yes. But it is still unhuman.
>
> > > > > In other words, everybody is suffering this crisis, but they suffer it
> > > > > much deeper as their income level is lower, as much as to marginalise
> > > > > huge amounts of people.
>
> > > > > More than ever, development from below !
>
> > > > > Peace and best wishes.
>
> > > > > Xi
>
> > > > >http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aBvgyrY3aNPg&refe...
>
> > > > > Nov. 29 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. holiday retail sales increased 3 percent
> > > > > yesterday from a year earlier, the smallest gain for a “Black Friday”
> > > > > in three years, research firm ShopperTrak RCT Corp. said.
>
> > > > > Sales rose to $10.6 billion, the Chicago-based company said in a
> > > > > statement. The increase was the smallest since a decline of 0.9
> > > > > percent in 2005 and compares with a jump of 8.3 percent last year.
>
> > > > > “So far, so good,” said Craig Johnson, president of Customer Growth
> > > > > Partners LLC, a retail consulting firm based in New Canaan,
> > > > > Connecticut. “But a decent Black Friday figure doesn’t predict the
> > > > > whole season. The question is, how much momentum we can keep” in this
> > > > > “challenging” economic environment, Johnson said.
>
> > > > > U.S. retailers are making earlier and deeper price cuts to lure
> > > > > Christmas shoppers, who are coping with the shrinking values of homes
> > > > > and stock holdings along with increasing joblessness. The season can
> > > > > account for as much as a third of annual profit.
>
> > > > > November and December sales at U.S. stores open at least a year may
> > > > > rise 1 percent, the smallest gain since 2002, according to the
> > > > > International Council of Shopping Centers, a New York- based trade
> > > > > group.
>
> > > > > Sales May Rise
>
> > > > > Sales may rise as much as 2 percent for the November- December period
> > > > > after the slow start in the first three weeks of November, Johnson
> > > > > said.
>
> > > > > Individuals may spend an average of $616 on holiday gifts this year,
> > > > > down 29 percent from a year earlier, according to a Gallup Inc. poll.
>
> > > > > Retailers promoted “doorbuster” deals to attract customers yesterday,
> > > > > called Black Friday because it was said to be when retailers started
> > > > > to make their annual profit.
>
> > > > > A worker was trampled by customers and killed yesterday at a Wal-Mart
> > > > > Stores Inc. location on New York’s Long Island, according to local
> > > > > police and the company. At least four shoppers were hurt at the store
> > > > > in Valley Stream, located about 13 miles (20 kilometers) from New York
> > > > > City, Nassau County Police said in a statement.
>
> > > > > U.S. shoppers gathered by the hundreds waiting to enter malls on Black
> > > > > Friday, some of which threw open their doors as early as midnight.
> > > > > They were lined up for discounts of as much as 70 percent.
>
> > > > > Kohl’s Corp., the fourth-largest U.S. department store, opened at 4
> > > > > a.m. Wal-Mart and Macy’s Inc. had a 5 a.m. start. Gap opened some
> > > > > locations on Thanksgiving Day.
>
> > > > > Fewer Shoppers
>
> > > > > ShopperTrak has estimated that 9.9 percent fewer shoppers will descend
> > > > > on stores this holiday season, producing a sales gain of 0.1 percent.
>
> > > > > “The mid-level department stores are the ones to watch,” Jay McIntosh,
> > > > > president of Consumer Foresight LLC, a Chicago- based consulting firm,
> > > > > said yesterday in a Bloomberg Television interview. “They’ll struggle
> > > > > this year. People tend to be trading down.”
>
> > > > > Consumers’ spending makes up more than two-thirds of the U.S. economy,
> > > > > and recent government data signal they are pulling back.
>
> > > > > Americans cut purchases by 1 percent last month, the biggest decline
> > > > > since the 2001 recession. After adjusting for inflation, spending was
> > > > > down for the fifth straight month, the longest streak since 1990-1991,
> > > > > according to U.S. Commerce Department data.
>
> > > > > Individuals may spend an average of $616 on holiday gifts this year,
> > > > > down 29 percent from a year earlier, according to a Gallup Inc. poll.
>
> > > > > ShopperTrak measures foot traffic in shopping centers
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"World-thread" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/world-thread?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to