What happened Silver you mind freeze over from too much PerpaFrost??
On Jan 25, 8:50 pm, silver <fourthofjuly2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> That was the only thing that the SC did - ruled that EPA can classify
> CO2 as a pollutant.
> Now look at the CAA. What Title are they going to put CO2 under?
> They would need to create a new Title, Title VII - Reduction of Global
> Warming Gases (or something like that). In order to add a new Title
> the ACT itself has to be ammended, and like I stated earlier - it
> ain't happening.
>
> http://www.epa.gov/air/caa/
>
> On Jan 25, 5:38 pm, "Mercury.Sailor" <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You dont need a provision in the CAA to regulate GHG as the SC has ruled
> > that Co2 is a Pollutant.
>
> > You dont want clean air? Is that it?
>
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:27 PM, silver <fourthofjuly2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Yes. The SC ruled that the EPA can use the CAA to regulate GHG but as
> > > it stands right now the CAA has no provisions in it to do so. In
> > > order for the CAA to be used for that purpose it has to be ammended,
> > > and as we all know only Congress can ammend an ACT.
>
> > > By the way things look today and the slow moving snail like
> > > incompetence of Congress - It would take years before they even
> > > address ammending the ACT.
>
> > > On Jan 25, 5:13 pm, "Mercury.Sailor" <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Supreme Court Clears the Air on CO2 Regulation
> > > > By Leo P. Dombrowski
>
> > > > On April 2, 2007 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the
> > > > Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has the authority to regulate
> > > > greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions from motor vehicles as "air
> > > > pollutants" under the Clean Air Act. Although the court left open the
> > > > possibility that the EPA might decline to exercise its authority to
> > > > regulate, given the sweeping nature of the court's opinion and the
> > > > EPA's past statements about global warming, it appears almost certain
> > > > that the agency will have to begin the rulemaking process.
>
> > > >http://www.wildman.com/bulletin/April_2007/1/
>
> > > > On Jan 24, 11:53 pm, silver <fourthofjuly2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > The EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate CO2 emissions because
> > > > > there are no provisions in the CAA to address CO2. It would take an
> > > > > act of congress to require EPA to promulgate regulations for CO2
> > > > > emissions.
>
> > > > > On Jan 24, 11:55 am, "Mercury.Sailor" <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > A pity it has not been done years ago. US car makers would not be
> > > into
> > > > > > > trouble nowadays
>
> > > > > > That takes "thinking and heart" something that was clearly lacking
> > > > > > from our policy makers, in the past.
>
> > > > > > On Jan 24, 2:43 pm, "xieu.l...@gmail.com" <xieu.l...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Great !
>
> > > > > > > A pity it has not been done years ago. US car makers would not be
> > > into
> > > > > > > trouble nowadays and they would be exporters. Probably they would
> > > not
> > > > > > > export assembled cars, but they would export green engines.
>
> > > > > > > In any case, congratulations !
>
> > > > > > > It is a turn toward the right direction and it will produce fruits
> > > in
> > > > > > > years to come.
>
> > > > > > > Peace and best wishes.
>
> > > > > > > Xi
>
> > > > > > > On 24 ene, 17:57, "Mercury.Sailor" <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > First 100 Days: Obama's first climate change target
>
> > > > > > > > After eight years of inaction on climate change by the federal
> > > > > > > > government, we can now look forward to the Obama administration
> > > > > > > > tackling global warming head on. With not a minute to lose, Lisa
> > > > > > > > Jackson, the soon-to-be new head of the EPA, should move quickly
> > > to
> > > > > > > > capitalize on the momentum of states that have so far been the
> > > leaders
> > > > > > > > in fighting global warming. There is no better place to start
> > > than by
> > > > > > > > establishing a national greenhouse gas emission standard for
> > > > > > > > automobiles based on California's landmark clean car law.
>
> > >http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/01/22/first-100-days-obama...
>
> > > > > > > > My hope would be the new EPA tackling coal burning utilities and
> > > > > > > > bringing them to thier knees!- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"World-thread" group.
To post to this group, send email to world-thread@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
world-thread+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/world-thread?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
