"I hope you're not suggesting going back to nested tables are you?"

Not on your life. Tableless, free-flowing, css driven layout is really the ticket, to 
be sure. I
much prefer the ease with which a page can be constructed and styled later. Add to 
this that once a
working template is created, one never has to consider presentation again. Adding new 
content to a
site is sooooo much easier when all one needs to do is insert it into a 'proven' 
construct. Not to
mention, restyling a site doesn't involve 're-tooling' it. This could never be done 
using tables.

Bert's thumbnail layout is really quite straight forward. Wish I'd o' thought of using 
inline
paragraphs as containers when I was having trouble with a thumbnail page, myself. The 
problem of
attaching caption to image, getting it to center with the thumbnail is completely 
overcome using
that simple technique. Beats <.td><.img><.br /><.a>caption<./a><./td> (ignore dots) 
all to heck when
it comes to elasticity and fluidity. Nice one, Bert.

On the other hand, if a page is not elastic (shudder) then a table works just fine, at 
least this
one does, anyway. It is still very linear.

Now this brings up the question: Is there a 'standard' way for linearizing tables? 
Does one move
across, then down row by row, or down then across column by column?

Roy


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "7 sinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 3:56 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Centering a liquid grid of image thumbs and captions



yes use tables, but use them wiely, use them as they were intended for (
tabular data )
I hope you're not suggesting going back to nested tables are you?

For me CSS holds to many advantages; and i feel it is just the future ( for
me ne ways )to effectivley render beautiful sematic webpages.

-peace

>From: "RC Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [WSG] Centering a liquid grid of image thumbs and captions
>Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 03:26:17 -0600
>
>They haven't deprecated the table tag, yet, have they? Maybe I'm just a
>beginner, but I can easily
>follow the difficulty folks are having with 'pure css.' It was fun for me
>until I saw that a
>hackless site was a near impossibility, even if it's just the 3-pixel jog
>hack (which doesn't work
>for lists).
>
>think the jury is going to be out for a long time on this one. There really
>is no 'hack free' way
>to deal with css and cross browser support. Sure there have been plenty of
>'elegant' uses of
>tableless markup, but when it takes a simple process and turns it into a
>morass of problems and
>surprises, it really does cross the line.
>
>Until the 'table police' show up and put on the cuffs, the best thing is do
>what is expedient, and
>what is effective and dependable. Whether for layout or tabular data, the
>use of tables, and their
>predictable results should not be discounted or frowned upon--especially if
>the table makes sense
>when linearized.
>
>What you are trying to do 'fits the bill' for a legitimate table. Until CSS
>reaches the point where
>proper centering, width and height is possible across all browsers and all
>platforms without hacks
>and kludges, hybrid designs should be expected, and not discouraged. As
>long as tables are still a
>part of html, I say use them.
>
>Roy
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rick Faaberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 10:30 PM
>Subject: Re: [WSG] Centering a liquid grid of image thumbs and captions
>
>
>On 6/4/04 9:10 PM "Nick Gleitzman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
>
> > A parting thought: does a series of thumbnail/caption pairs actually
>qualify
> > as tabular data - thus leaving me feeling better about giving up and
>using a
> > table to lay the bloody thing out anyway?
>
>That was my first thought when I began to read about your angst.
>
>It's tabular data - deal with that way. Get it over with.
>
>I'm no authority.
>
>Rick Faaberg
>
>*****************************************************
>The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
>*****************************************************
>
>
>
>*****************************************************
>The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
>*****************************************************
>

_________________________________________________________________
Open an Online Savings Account today & collect a bonus $30*!
http://clk.atdmt.com/1DG/go/hsb005000991dg/direct/01/

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************


*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to