Right, Now I understand

The guidelines say all form elements need to have default text inside them, but a form field with the type="password" always renders as ***** regardless of the content

I think commonsense should prevail and you should leave the password field empty, otherwise you will confuse some users

Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web Development & IT consultancy
Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27

http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts
http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav

Andreas Boehmer wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Neerav

1. You may want to research the pros and cons of automated accessibility
testing


I completely agree that automated accessibility tests are not efficient
enough to rate a website accessible. However, there are reasons why these
tests ask for default place-holders, which I do not want to plainly ignore,
just because they have been requested by Bobby.


2. what do you mean by "password place-holder" ?


If I put a default place-holder into a form field with the type="password",
it obviously appears as "***********". That's the bit I would like to avoid,
yet for accessibility reasons it may be required to provide it.

There's a discussion going on whether default place-holders are really
necessary or not. Appearantly there are some browsers or assistive
technologies that do not find form elements if they don't have a default
text in them.


Neerav Bhatt

Andreas Boehmer wrote:

Hi guys,

I have got a website (www.jet.org.au) that passes Bobby almost with AAA,
with the exception of the default place holders. The reason I

do not want to

put them into the site is because every page has got a login form at the
top. With the default place-holders, the login form would look something
like this:

Username: Enter username
Password: ************

The password place-holder looks pretty useless and confusing to me. Most
users will plain wonder what that is supposed to do, it's not

really helpful

at all.

So I'd love to hear your opinions on this one? Shall I enter

them just to

pass the accessibility tests, or leave them out for (in my

opinion) better

usability? Being so close to AAA and not reaching it is frustrating.

Thanks!

Andreas.





******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************





****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************



Reply via email to