.... and regardless of the benefits or otherwise of placeholder text
in text inputs, having dummy values in password fields is presumably
useless.

 in fact, i would say it's worse than useless, as the last thing you
want is someone leaving the password field unchanged and then having
no idea what the password is.

i conclude that this is a bug in Bobby and/or a flaw in the guidelines
that it is based on.


On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 17:19:45 +1000, Web Usability
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry I am late on this topic.
> 
> But I agree with Steven. In practice, the screen reader users I have worked
> with find form place holders an irritant.
> 
> Roger
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2004 4:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [WSG] default place-holders for forms
> 
> Hi Andreas,
> not sure about the article, but we  do recommend to our clients that they
> not use default place holding cahracters.
>  from what i have read on the various accessibility lists, it appears that
> it is pretty safe to say that the checkpoint is no longer relevant.
> but i may be wrong..............
> 
> some relevant list discussions
> 
> Paul Bohman from webaim was saying its no longer needed back in 02'
> http://www.webaim.org/discussion/mail_message.php?id=2113
> 
> Updating specs and tools Re: place-holding characters in edit/text boxes:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2003JulSep/0399.html
> 
> with regards
> 
> Steven Faulkner
> Web Accessibility Consultant
> National Information & Library Service (NILS)
> 454 Glenferrie Road
> Kooyong Victoria 3144
> Phone: (613) 9864 9281
> Fax: (613) 9864 9210
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> National Information Library Service
> A subsidiary of RBS.RVIB.VAF Ltd.
> 
> ******************************************************
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
>  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> ******************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ******************************************************
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
>  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>  for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> ******************************************************
> 
>
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to