Tim MacKay wrote: > Hello all, >My first guess would be an ordered list but the definitions underneath don’t >really allow for > it.
Why? > A definition list doesn’t seem very appropriate either because of > the wordiness of the explanations; to me a true definition list would > only be a few words. I don't think theres any rules about the length of definitions? If the list has a specific order, as you've shown, then I would say use an ordered list, if not a definition list -- Chris Knowles ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
