Agreed thanks,
 
I don't know much about JavaScript, but is there really a way to make
sure that you get all users? 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dave Woods
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 2:33 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Background images versus image


"What are the chances of that happening? I would think it would be very
slim wouldn't it?"

You'd be surprised... I know a few dialup users who browse with images
disabled to speed up loading times but leave CSS and JavaScript on so
that the presentation and any enhanced functionality is still available.

I agree that these types of users are in the minority but they do exist.




On 25/01/2008, Likely, James A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 



        From all of the examples that I have seen this is the one that
        accommodates most users.

        How would a screen reader read this option? Has any one tested
something
        similar to the example that I found?

        Thanks again for the help.

        James

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        On Behalf Of Christian Snodgrass
        Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 1:03 PM
        To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
        Subject: Re: [WSG] Background images versus image

        That isn't bad, but if you have Javascript and CSS, but no
images, it
        fails completely.

        Likely, James A. wrote:
        > Thanks for the emails. Some things I didn't think of but will
from now

        > on. I have been doing some reading and looking at options and
found
        > this example.
        >
        > http://www.chriserwin.com/scripts/crir/
        >
        > What are your thoughts on this approach?
        >
        > To me it looks pretty user friendly.
        >
        > Please let me know as this is new to me.
        >
        > Thanks
        >
        > James
        >
        >

------------------------------------------------------------------------
        > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Dave Woods
        > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 23, 2008 8:59 AM
        > *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
        > *Subject:* Re: [WSG] Background images versus image
        >
        > The first question I'd ask is why not just use check boxes
instead of
        > trying to replicate them? If you mark them up correctly then
there's
        > really no better accessible method than using the correct
element as
        > it was meant.
        >
        > If you go down this route then you're likely to create all
kinds of
        > problems for yourself... what happens when users don't have
css
        > available (mobile devices), images disabled (dialup users) or
are
        > using screenreaders.
        >
        > If you want to change the appearance then I'd use JavaScript
to
        > enhance the existing check boxes but for those user agents
that don't
        > support JavaScript or have it disabled you should have the
fall back
        > of regular forms.
        >
        > Hope that helps.
        >
        > - - - - -
        > http://www.dave-woods.co.uk
        >
        >
        > On 23/01/2008, *Likely, James A.* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
        >
        >     Hello,
        >
        >     I am working on a new site for a client and need some
thoughts on
        >     a problem that I have.
        >
        >     I am making a list with clickable boxes (like input boxes)
that
        >     have a checked, disabled and clickable state. My question
is, what
        >     would work best. Using background images or adding images
to the
        >     code.
        >
        >     The reason I ask is
        >
        >     1) If I use images, we can add alt text to describe what
function
        >     the images have. This would help with screen readers and
people
        >     with disabilities.
        >
        >     2) Background images keep the code clean but wonder about
the alt
        >     text and how screen readers and people with disabilities
would
        >     read the site. Is there a way to imitate the alt for
background
        >     images?
        >
        >     You can see an example of both ways at:
        >
        >     Using images:
_http://wisconsin.joekiosk.com/list/list.html_
        >     Using background images:
        >     _http://wisconsin.joekiosk.com/list/list2.html_
        >
        >     Let me know your thoughts and what you think would work
best. I
        >     love the background images as the code is clean, but has
any one
        >     done any testing to see how this would work for screen
readers or
        >     do you have suggestions on how to make it more accessible?
        >
        >     Thanks for the help.
        >
        >     James
        >
        >
        >

*******************************************************************
        >     List Guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
        >     Unsubscribe:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
        >     <http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm>
        >     Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        >

*******************************************************************
        >
        >
        >
        >
*******************************************************************
        > List Guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
        > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
        > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
*******************************************************************
        >
*******************************************************************
        > List Guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
        > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
        > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >
*******************************************************************


        --

        Christian Snodgrass
        Azure Ronin Web Design
        http://www.arwebdesign.net/ <http://www.arwebdesign.net>
        Phone: 859.816.7955




*******************************************************************
        List Guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
        Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
        Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*******************************************************************



*******************************************************************
        List Guidelines:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
        Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
        Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

*******************************************************************





*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to