I'm finding myself having to justify my work methods to a boss who
has almost zero interest in usability, accessibility or standards.
(Though I have managed to get into the long-term plan: "...website
that is compliant with W3C standards and Section 508...")
One question that has been raised is "if site X has pages that
validate as transitional, why do you have to produce pages that
validate as strict?"
To my embarrassment I don't have a ready answer - I realise that it's
something that I've essentially taken on faith.
Any one care to help fill in the blanks?
"Pages that validate as strict are superior to transitional because
_______________."
"It is important to serve pages that validate as strict because
_______________."
Thanks in advance.
Andrew
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
