Why would you avoid w3schools? They do have some good information. So why? On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Breton Slivka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Nancy Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any free good online > > tutorials (best practices and/or standards based) to help me learn to > > write javascript? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Nancy > > This is the best javascript lesson book online that i've found. Avoid > w3cSchools at all costs. > http://eloquentjavascript.net/ > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:32 PM, James Jeffery > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The language itself is NOT object-orientated, its proto-type based. It > can > > be used in an OOP fashion, but this is not true Object Orientation as it > is > > in languages such as C++. > > > > > I've already covered this earlier, but in short, "prototype-based", > and "object oriented" are not mutually exclusive. they are orthogonal > concepts. Javascript is prototype based AND object oriented. > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
