Christian Snodgrass wrote:
I second that. They actually have a LOT more bad information than they do good information, and what little good information they have is often quite out of date (so, it was good information, but not anymore).
And when they _do_ add new information, they get that wrong too: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2008-August/016157.html -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
