W3Schools is Soooo 1995
On 24-Oct-08, at 6:59 PM, Brett Patterson wrote:
Why would you avoid w3schools? They do have some good information.
So why?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Breton Slivka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Nancy Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bit off topic, but not totally: are there any free good online
> tutorials (best practices and/or standards based) to help me
learn to
> write javascript?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nancy
This is the best javascript lesson book online that i've found. Avoid
w3cSchools at all costs.
http://eloquentjavascript.net/
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:32 PM, James Jeffery
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The language itself is NOT object-orientated, its proto-type
based. It can
> be used in an OOP fashion, but this is not true Object Orientation
as it is
> in languages such as C++.
>
I've already covered this earlier, but in short, "prototype-based",
and "object oriented" are not mutually exclusive. they are orthogonal
concepts. Javascript is prototype based AND object oriented.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
