with respect to both sides here, I have had numerous clients come to me
requesting Contribute as a solution. I would say the reason, in every case
i believe, is the cost. It's a 1 time fee of $99. I imagine, that if you
can offer something comparable or cheaper to them, they would appreciate
the  recommendation and scrap Contribute if the other product(s) worked
better, were easier to maintain and implement, etc.

I would guess here that the client isn't dictating technology, but budget
for CMS. I mean, what are the chances they've used a bunch of solutions,
and settled that Contribute is the best and meets their workflow?

My recommendation is to try something like http://www.cushycms.com/ which
is also free and is a hosted solution. I've used this with pretty good
success. It's not without it's limitation, but it's extremely easy to use
and met the needs of one of my clients. You obviously could go with a more
common solution like Expression Engine, or Wordpress, etc.

I would find out why your client wants to use Contribute, and if you'd
rather not use it, then your job is to find something comparable or better
(hopefully for the same cost or less) and state your case.

> Mark Harris wrote:
>> Joe Ortenzi wrote:
>>> Contribute is not about content management as much as it is about
>>> allowing an in-house web team to share tasks without a "proper" CMS
>>> deployed. Thus your coder can code and the content writer can write
>>> but it can be all wrapped within a team. This is, frankly, Web 1.0,
>>> and your time and their money is better served by getting a simple CMS
>>> deployed that meets with their scope and strategy and will be easier
>>> to manage for everyone, client included.
>> With respect, this is so much bollocks.
>> The manner of deployment is always the client's choice. If you can offer
>> her something better, by all means offer, but it's arrogant to tell the
>> client "you have to do it this way".
>> Many clients won't have an "in-house" web team - they'll have one person
>> to whom "maintaining the website" is only 1/4 of their job. Some outfits
>> are still coming to grips with how they should be using the web and need
>> baby steps.
>> While it's a designer's job to help educate them, you can't drag them
>> kicking and screaming into something they're not ready for.
>> Regards
>> Mark Harris

List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to