Hi All, further to Joe's comments below, we have now reintegrated his WSPR mode work in the wsjtx_exp branch into the main WSJT-X development branch. Currently wsjtx_exp is dormant and the latest and greatest WSJT-X is to be found on the main development branch ^/branches/wsjtx .
The main development branch (a.k.a. the trunk) still builds as v1.6.0-devel. Until further notice only the WSJT-X branches ^/branches/wsjtx-1.5 and ^/branches/wsjtx are active and should have any changes submitted. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 22/05/2015 17:45, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi all, > > I believe WSJT-X v1.6.1 now works well in all of its supported modes: > JT9, JT65(A-C), JT4(A-G), and WSPR-2. Surely there is more work to be > done: to name just a few items on my To Do list, WSPR-15 should be > implemented, message averaging should be added to JT65, and a higher > accuracy EME Doppler calculation should replace the present one, which > may have errors as large as 20 Hz at 10 GHz. Probably also some cleanup > and/or refactoring of source code, some "beauty-treatments" on the GUI > here and there, etc. > > I think these things can reasonably be done in our normal development > branch, so I'd like to suggest it's time to merge my "features branch", > aka .../branches/wsjtx_exp, aka v1.6.1, back into the main development > branch, .../branches/wsjtx. > > Is everyone OK with this plan? Among other advantages, it will mean > that our current SVN branches .../wsjt_exp, .../wspr, and .../wsprx will > become inactive. This will result in a considerable simplification in > the way we manage our source code and will minimize the required number > of cross-branch merges. > > -- Joe, K1JT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
