On 27/05/2015 19:24, Alessandro Gorobey wrote: > Hi Bill, Hi Sandro, > > I perfectly understand the status. > > But I hope that some very good software will no be lost. > > Eg jt9sim.exe is compiled but not installed. > Eg All the FMT suite present in WSPR that using PY only for marginal > operations and use some library of WSJTX The tool jt9sim is intended as a developer tool rather than an end user tool.
The FMT suite is published software so I expect it will remain so. I believe they are simple Fortran programs that can be easily migrated to the WSJT-X build script and installed as part of the WSJT-X package. > > why not maintain these as installed programs as your exceptional > message_aggregator (and I hope also the new frequency list) outside the > program ? Hardly exceptional Sandro, it is just a reference implementation demonstrating the UDP message broadcasts from WSJT-X. It has no real purpose other than as an example to developers of cooperating applications. My intention was to not ship message_aggregator when it comes to the first GA of v1.5 as by that time there should be applications using the new protocol like JTAlertX. > > The main program is WSJTX, but who want use the additional programs can Well that is try for anyone who builds from sources as the additional developer tools are all built by the CMake build script. We already choose to package jt9code, jt4code and, jt65code as they are useful tools for end users that are referenced in the user guide. > ...... > > 73's > Sandro > IW3RAB 73 Bill G4WJS. > > > > Il 27/05/2015 18:26, Bill Somerville ha scritto: >> Hi All, >> >> further to Joe's comments below, we have now reintegrated his WSPR mode >> work in the wsjtx_exp branch into the main WSJT-X development branch. >> Currently wsjtx_exp is dormant and the latest and greatest WSJT-X is to >> be found on the main development branch ^/branches/wsjtx . >> >> The main development branch (a.k.a. the trunk) still builds as v1.6.0-devel. >> >> Until further notice only the WSJT-X branches ^/branches/wsjtx-1.5 and >> ^/branches/wsjtx are active and should have any changes submitted. >> >> 73 >> Bill >> G4WJS. >> >> On 22/05/2015 17:45, Joe Taylor wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I believe WSJT-X v1.6.1 now works well in all of its supported modes: >>> JT9, JT65(A-C), JT4(A-G), and WSPR-2. Surely there is more work to be >>> done: to name just a few items on my To Do list, WSPR-15 should be >>> implemented, message averaging should be added to JT65, and a higher >>> accuracy EME Doppler calculation should replace the present one, which >>> may have errors as large as 20 Hz at 10 GHz. Probably also some cleanup >>> and/or refactoring of source code, some "beauty-treatments" on the GUI >>> here and there, etc. >>> >>> I think these things can reasonably be done in our normal development >>> branch, so I'd like to suggest it's time to merge my "features branch", >>> aka .../branches/wsjtx_exp, aka v1.6.1, back into the main development >>> branch, .../branches/wsjtx. >>> >>> Is everyone OK with this plan? Among other advantages, it will mean >>> that our current SVN branches .../wsjt_exp, .../wspr, and .../wsprx will >>> become inactive. This will result in a considerable simplification in >>> the way we manage our source code and will minimize the required number >>> of cross-branch merges. >>> >>> -- Joe, K1JT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
